December 13, 2008
When the US has a cold....
Danielle heard a saying from school recently..."When the US has a cold, Canada sneezes." We're seeing that more and more each day as Canada is just weeks or months behind the US as far as the economic crisis. Trust us, financially Canada is not sugar coated (or maple syrupy) either. Daily we pass by businesses that have closed. Although, just driving by the mall a while ago it looked packed.
Canadians are concerned about the financial issues in the US since so much of Canada's business industry is reliant on the US. The TransCanadian Hwy (I-40) is lined with Hewlett Packard, Apple, Microsoft, Easton and several pharmaceutical company offices.
Regarding the auto industry specifically -- Danielle and Kish went to the movies recently and before the film started there were commercials for cars we have never seen or heard about. They were from Toyota (we think) and they were all eco-friendly, electric or using some vegetable for fuel (we don't recall all the details). But what has been interesting is seeing how much more progressive Canadians seem to be in fuel-efficiency, likely because taxes on gas are so high and they are used to spending a lot. The point is that large Gas-capades and SUVs are few and far between. You're more likely to see a Subaru Outback or a Volvo Cross Country on the road -- with snow tires of course.
As we all await word about what will happen in Detroit, this editorial appeared in the Montreal Gazette today.
No easy answers to the auto-industry crisis
DECEMBER 13, 2008
Is Congress fiddling while Detroit burns? Or are U.S. lawmakers just being prudent with $15 billion of taxpayers' money?
Late Thursday the planned bailout of General Motors, Chrysler and Ford was derailed by Senate Republicans - or by truculent union leaders, take your choice - and now President George W. Bush is reported considering using for the purpose $15 billion from the $700 billion Congress authorized previously for a whole range of bailout projects, without many strings attached.
In Canada, the federal and Ontario governments are standing, chequebooks open, waiting to see how the U.S. drama plays out. The specific danger for Canada is that once Uncle Sam gets his thumb on the scales in this fully integrated continental industry, U.S. jobs will be given primacy over Canadian ones. Congressional good will toward Canada isn't worth a rusty Edsel in times like these.
More broadly, the whole auto bailout issue remains controversial. True, $15 billion is under-the-sofa-cushions small change by the standard that has become normal in this abnormal season of "bailouts" and "stimuli" around the world. But what if governments prop up the Big Three - as they were once known - and in three or four months they come back, with their hands out again?
The underlying problem is not arrogant executives or bad decisions, but excess capacity. It's hard to imagine auto sales rebounding strongly in calendar 2009 and GM and Chrysler, and to a lesser extent Ford, will continue to struggle with fixed costs and sluggish sales. Short-term bailouts can at best give a little time for some kind of drastic action.
Nor is the prospect of a "car czar" very appealing: The last time a state controlled what cars got made, the result was the Lada. With oil prices down, consumers could well be clamouring, say two years from now, for big boxy SUVs once again. What if nobody wants to buy the politically correct little "green" sedans Congress and bureaucrats could mandate as part of a bailout?
Nor are the problems limited to two or three companies. Parts makers, tool-and-die shops, and other employers are part of the industry, too. If even one of the Big Three goes down, ripple-effect bankruptcies, or at least layoffs, will swamp the sector. Remember, though, that most of that capacity would be needed again before long, as the industry reorganizes. North Americans still buy a lot of vehicles, even in a bad year.
Plainly something will have to give in the auto industry. The companies that emerge from this inferno, once the economy begins to revive, will be more efficient than the Detroit Three today. But will they be the same companies? And should that decision really be up to Congress? Those are the questions we will see answered before long.
© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette
Posted by Kish Pisani at 1:11 PM